The reason or lack thereof behind today's current events.

Sunday, June 19, 2005

Armchair Generals

I hate to make my first full posting about the eminent domainIraq war but events dictate otherwise. This week, in a dramatic reversal, Republican Rep. eminent domainWalter Jones, the creator of "eminent domainfreedom fries", joined the anti-war camp calling for a eminent domaintimetable to pull out of Iraq. Jones' change of heart came after attending the funeral of a fallen Marine. While any loss of life anywhere by any means is a sad and disheartening thing, it is almost equally so when one of the leaders of a great nation allows his personal feelings to cloud his view of the big picture. Congressman Jones has chosen to join the ever growing political group that assumes to play the role of general from the comfort of their homes and offices. These "eminent domainarmchair generals" see the nature of warfare as simple and easy to manage. Neither of these presumptions are true.
In the cry to set a timetable to exit Iraq, people forget that terrorists and insurgents will know of this timetable. Say, for example, if a July 2006 deadline to pull out of Iraq was set. Do you know what would happen? The insurgency would vanish the moment that timetable is announced. That's right. No more insurgency. But do you know what would happen in August 2006? The insurgency would return with ten times it's present strength, the Iraqi government would fall and an Iraqi version of the Taliban would rise.
The reason for this is the fact that there is no one more patient than a terrorist. If a deadline or timetable is created, the terrorists and insurgents will simply wait until the pull out is complete before attacking. The public and politicians must remember that the enemy is extremely intelligent and will exploit any mistake that the world makes. This is why people must learn to leave military planning to real generals and reserve their armchairs for watching TV.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Definatley have to agree here. The largest problem we're facing in fighting a so called war on terrorism is that we are not commited to the fight. Outrageous you say? Hardly so!
The fundamentilist Islamics and they're close cousin militant Islamics are in this for the long haul. Their stated time-table streaches into the next millenium. Their first target for conversion is London, and their aim is within the next century to have its common law largely reflective of Islamic Law. As London is currently one of the most culturally modern cities in the world, it is the perfect canidate. Not to mention, the Islamic minority is currently the fastest growing religious minority, outstripping all others and the current majority.
I'm all for democracy and the free practice of religion, but this is not a shift in society by natural currents, it is a deliberate take over for the point of world domination through oppressive religion.
We cannot win this war at present because we cannont stand to use the kind of military force needed to. We need to double the size of the Army, put more boots on the ground. Less lienency in rules of engagment. Worst of all, we have to accept the casualities of war. This grows harder every generation, as more and more soldiers are fathers and mothers, or National Gaurdsman whose families never saw the post 9/11 world coming.
It's a harsh reality we must either face, or be destroyed by. This is a persistent war that will last for generations.

6/19/2005 01:22:00 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home